South Sudan, Somalia and Iran excluded from one of Australia's refugee programs
![]() |
| IDPS PHOTO TAKEN IN PARIANG BY EMMANUEL MALUAL MAKUACH DURING CONFLICT |
Humanitarian migrants from eight countries
will be prioritized under one of Australia’s refugee resettlement programs,
with other nationalities told their applications are highly unlikely to be
accepted.
The Guardian understands the priority
countries are: the Democratic Republic of Congo, Afghanistan, Eritrea,
Ethiopia, Myanmar, Bhutan, Syria and Iraq. Nationals of several other specific
countries that were previously considered for resettlement, such as South
Sudan, Somalia and Iran, are now excluded and will not be able to access the
program. The move has been condemned by some community leaders as “clear
discrimination”.
The resettlement scheme, known as the
Community Support Program, is one element of Australia’s broader humanitarian
program, which, this year, offers up to 1,000 places, taken from within the
broader program of 16,250 places.
Australia’s scheme is much more expensive – to sponsor an
individual refugee costs about $48,000, a family of five about $100,000 – and,
for every humanitarian migrant privately sponsored, and the government
resettles one fewer under its program.
This “offset” has led to criticism of the
scheme as the government abrogating its commitment to resettle refugees,
instead outsourcing resettlement to private individuals or community groups.
Late last year, Amir Taghinia, an Iranian
refugee held within Australia’s regional processing centre on Manus Island, was
privately sponsored by a Canadian family and their community to resettle in
British Columbia.
Paul Power from the Refugee Council of
Australia said Australia’s private sponsorship scheme was “the most expensive in
the world” and that the government was “using desperate refugee families to
fund its commitment that it made to resettle refugees”.
“It’s very hard to understand the rationale
for prioritizing certain groups of refugees over others: why Eritreans in Ethiopia
would be eligible, but in Sudan they would not be.”
we have a small favor to
ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues
across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organizations, we
haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So
you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent,
investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce.
But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well
be your perspective, too.


Comments
Post a Comment